European singles and doubles badminton matches analysis with specific focus on pair doubles

  • Yann Le Mansec Laboratory Movement, Interactions, Performance (EA4334), Faculty of Sport Sciences, University of Nantes, France
  • Martin Boiveau Laboratory Movement, Interactions, Performance (EA4334), Faculty of Sport Sciences, University of Nantes, France
  • Julie Doron Laboratory Movement, Interactions, Performance (EA4334), Faculty of Sport Sciences, University of Nantes. Laboratory of Sport, Expertise and Performance (EA7370), French National Institute of Sport, Expertise and Performance, Research Department, Paris, France https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3967-709X
  • Marc Jubeau Laboratory Movement, Interactions, Performance (EA4334), Faculty of Sport Sciences, University of Nantes, France https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4878-7813
Keywords: physical demand, smash, racket sports, jump, effort

Abstract

The main aims of the present study were i) to examine the different demands (temporal and muscular data) between different types of events in badminton (part 1) and ii) to compare the real activity (areas distribution and strokes distribution) between the two players who composed the pair during the three types of doubles that occur in badminton (part 2). Seven matches were analyzed for both men’s and women’s singles and for men’s, women’s and mixed doubles during the 2016 European Championships. In Part 1, both timing structure (match duration, number of points, rally duration, rest time, effective playing time and shot frequency) and specific movements (jumps and lunges) were compared between the five types of events. In Part 2, after dividing the court into four zones, we compared the activity of the two players within the same pair in each of these zones. The distribution of technical variables and specific movements was also analysed. For Part 1, male and mixed doubles showed the shortest rally duration (~-45%), the longest rest between two rallies (~+18%), as well as the highest shot frequency (~+24%) when compared to male and female singles and female doubles. Male and female singles showed the highest number of jumps (+40% when compared to doubles) and lunges (+250% when compared to doubles). Male and female singles showed the highest number of jumps (+40% when compared to doubles) and lunges (+250% when compared to doubles). For Part 2, we observed that spatial and notational distribution between players of the pair is largely dependent on the type of double considered. This study demonstrated that the constraints of a badminton game are specific and related to the type of event played (males or females and/or singles or doubles).

References

Abián, P., Castanedo, A., Feng, X. Q., Sampedro, J., & Abian-Vicen, P. (2014). Notational comparison of men’s singles badminton matches between Olympic Games in Beijing and London. Int J Perform Anal Sport, 14(1), 42-53.

Abian-Vicen, J., Castanedo, A., Abián, P., & Sampedro, J. (2013). Temporal and notational comparison of badminton matches between men’s singles and women’s singles. Int J Perform Anal Sport, 13(2), 310-320.

Abián-Vicen, A., Sánchez, L., & Abián, P. (2018). Performance structure analysis of the men’s and women’s badminton doubles matches in the Olympic Games from 2008 to 2016 during playoffs stage. Int J Perform Analysis Sport, 18(4), 633-644.

Alcock, A., & Cable, T. (2009). A comparison of singles and doubles badminton: heart rate response, player profiles and game characteristics. Int J Perform Analysis Spor, 9(2), 228-237.

Chiminazzo, J. G. C., Barreira, J., Luz, L. S. M., Saraiva, W. C., & Cayres, J. T. C. (2018). Technical and timing characteristics of badminton men’s singles: comparison between groups and play-offs stages in 2016 Rio Olympic Games. Int J Perf Anal Sport, 18(2),245-254.

Cohen, J. (2013). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. New York, NY: Academic Press.

Gawin, W., Beyer, C., Hasse, H., & Büsch, D. (2013). How to attack the service: an empirical contribution to rally opening in world-class badminton doubles. Int J Perform Analysis Sport, 13(3), 860-871.

Gawin, W., Beyer, C., & Seidler, M. (2015). A competition analysis of the single and double disciplines in world-class badminton. Int J Perform Analysis Sport, 15(3), 997-1006.

Jung Hoon, C., & Hak-Kyun, K. (2020) Physical fitness and characteristic analysis of Korean national prospective badminton team members stratified by gender and game type. Korean J Sports Med, 38(2),95-100.

Kuntze, G., Mansfield, N., & Sellers, W. (2010). A biomechanical analysis of common lunge tasks in badminton. J Sports Sci, 28(2),183-191.

Le Mansec, Y., Perez, J., Rouault, Q., Doron, J., & Jubeau, M. (2020). Impaired performance of the smash stroke in badminton induced by muscle fatigue. Int J Sports Physiol Perfor, 15(1),52-59.

Le Mansec, Y., Sève, C., & Jubeau, M. (2017). Neuromuscular fatigue and time motion analysis during a table tennis competition. J Sports Med Phys Fitness, 57(4), 353-361.

Liddle, S. D., Murphy, M. H., & Bleakley, W. (1996). A comparison of the demands of singles and doubles badminton among elite male players: a heart rate and time/motion analysis. J Hum Mov Stud, 29(4), 159-176.

Lin, Z., Blazevich, A. J., Abbiss, C. R, Wilkie, J. C, & Nosaka, K. (2023). Neuromuscular fatigue and muscle damage following a simulated singles badminton match. Eur J Appl Physiol, 123, 1229-1240.

Phomsoupha, M., & Laffaye, G. (2015). The science of badminton: game characteristics, anthropometry, physiology, visual fitnessand biomechanics. Sports Med, 45(4), 473-495.

Rusdiana, A., Subarjah, H., Imanudin, I., Kusdinar, Y., Syahid, A. M., & Kurniawan, T. (2020). Effect of fatigue on biomechanical variable changes in overhead badminton jump smash. Ann Appl Sport Sci, 8(3), 1-9.

Sobko, I., Zharkova, Y., Vitsko, S., Zhukov, V., & Tsapko, A. (2020). Formation of doubles and mixed categories in badminton using multivariate analysis methods. J Phys Education and Sport, 20(6), 3138-3145.

Torres-Luque, G., Fernández-Garcia, A. I., Blanca-Torres, J. C., Kondric, M., & Cabello-Manrique, D. (2019). Statistical differences in set analysis in badminton at the Rio 2016 Olympic Games. Front Psychol, 731.

Widyaningsih, W. W., Handayani, O. W. K., & Hidayah, T. (2018). The relationship between personality of single and double athletes of badminton toward achievement level in PB. Djarum. J Phys Education and Sports, 7(1), 1-6.

Published
2023-10-23
How to Cite
Le Mansec, Y., Boiveau, M., Doron, J., & Jubeau, M. (2023). European singles and doubles badminton matches analysis with specific focus on pair doubles. International Journal of Racket Sports Science, 5(1), 14-22. Retrieved from https://journal.racketsportscience.org/index.php/ijrss/article/view/94