Are Technical and Timing Components in Para-Badminton Classifications Different?

  • Aline Miranda Strapasson PhD professor in Physical Education, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), Department of Physical Education, Physiotherapy and Dance (ESEFID).
  • Mário Antônio de Moura Simim PhD professor in Sport Sciences, Federal University of Ceará (UFC), Institute of Physical Education and Sports (IEFES).
  • João Guilherme Cren Chiminazzo PhD professor in Physical Education, Jaguariúna University Center (UNIFAJ), Department of Physical Education.
  • Thiago José Leonardi PhD professor in Physical Education, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), Department of Physical Education, Physiotherapy and Dance (ESEFID).
  • Roberto Rodrigues Paes PhD professor in Education, State University of Campinas (UNICAMP), Faculty of Physical Education (FEF).
Keywords: Paralympic Sport, Notational Analysis, Para-Badminton, Physical Disabilities


Considering the reduced amount of studies with Para-Badminton (PBd) and the need to understand the technical, tactical and functional classes, the purpose of this research is to investigate the frequency of technical components and timing characteristics in categories WH1(Wheelchair/severe impairment) and WH2 (Wheelchair/minor impairment) of PBd, in addition to comparing said data between classes. Twenty PBd matches were analyzed in the men's individual category, at the 11th World PBd Championship. The mean playing time of the matches was 1780 seconds (SD = 575) for the WH1 class and 2012 seconds (SD = 1098) for WH2. The average rally time was 10.2 minutes (SD = 8.4) for the WH1 and 12.5 (SD = 12.5) for WH2. The average related to pause time was 15 seconds (SD = 10.3) for the WH1 class and 14.1 (SD = 10.5) for the WH2. The mean number of shots in the shuttle per game obtained was 552 (SD = 197) and 719 (SD = 480) for class WH1 and WH2, respectively. In both classes: the most frequent shots performed by the players were Clear, Lob, Drop, and Net-shot; the players used backhand more often than the forehand service and the short service compared to the long one; the errors stood out in relation to the winner points. In addition to this, there was a higher proportion of shots at the front of the court in both classes. It was found that the WH2 class showed a higher intensity (longer rally time and shorter pause time) and a higher frequency of technical actions (higher number of hits on the shuttle) when compared to the WH1. This information can assist coaches during training to guide the development of the temporal and technical aspects of the PBd, as well as monitor them during matches to obtain victory.


Abian-Vicent, J., Castanedo, A., Abian, P., & Sampedro, J. (2013). Temporal and Notational Comparison of Badminton Matches Between Men’s Singles and Women’s Singles. International Journal of Performance Analysis in Sport, 13(2), 310-320.

Antunes, D., Rossato, M., Kons, R. L., Sakugawa, R. L., & Fischer, G. (2017). Neuromuscular features in sprinters with cerebral palsy: case studies based on paralympic classification. Journal of Exercise Rehabilitation, 13(6), 716-721.

Barreira, J., Chiminazzo, J. G. C., & Fernandes, P. T. (2016). Analysis of point difference established by winners and losers in games of badminton. International Journal of Performance Analysis in Sport, 16, 687- 694.

Beckman, E. M., Connick, M. J., & Tweedy, S. M. (2017). Assessing muscle strength for the purpose of classification in Paralympic sport: A review and recommendations. Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport, 20(4), 391-396.

Burkett, B., Payton, C., Van de Vliet, P., Jarvis, H., Daly, D., Mehrkuehler, C., . . . Hogarth, L. (2018). Performance Characteristics of Para Swimmers: How Effective Is the Swimming Classification System? Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Clinics of North America, 29(2), 333-346.

BWF, B. W. F. (2020). Para badminton. Retrieved from

Cabello-Manrique, D., & Gonzalez-Badillo, J. (2003). Analysis of the Characteristics of Competitive Badminton. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 37, 62-66.

Chiminazzo, J. G. C., Barreira, J., Luz, L. S. M., Saraiva, W. C., & Cayres, J. T. (2018). Technical and timing characteristics of badminton men?s single: comparison between groups and play-offs stages in 2016 Rio Olympic Games. International Journal of Performance Analysis in Sport, 18, 1-10.

Chiminazzo, J. G. C., Ferreira, R., Castanho, G. K. F., Barreira, J., & Fernandes, P. T. (2017). Fewer mistakes for more winning: a badminton analysis. Brazilian Journal of Science and Movement, 25(2), 115-121.

Fernandez-Fernandez, J., Sanz-Rivas, D., & Mendez- Villanueva, A. (2009). A Review of the Activity Profile and Physiological Demands of Tennis Match Play. Strength and Conditioning Journal, 31(4), 15-26.

Haydon, D. S., Pinder, R. A., Grimshaw, P. N., & Robertson, W. S. P. (2018). Overground-Propulsion Kinematics and Acceleration in Elite Wheelchair Rugby. International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance, 13(2), 156-162.

IPC, I. P. C. (2014). PC Governing Board approves first 16 sports to be included in the Tokyo 2020 Paralympic Games. Retrieved from -

Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977). The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data. Biometrics, 33(1), 159-174.

Latino, F., Cassese, F. P., & Tafuri, D. (2018). Badminton: from competitive motor activity to inclusive didactics Acta Medica Mediterranea, 34, 1521-1524.

Phomsoupha, M., & Laffaye, G. (2015). The science of badminton: game characteristics, anthropometry, physiology, visual fitness and biomechanics. Spors Medicine, 45(4), 473-495.

Rhodes, J. M., Mason, B. S., Malone, L. A., & Goosey- Tolfrey, V. L. (2015). Effect of team rank and player classification on activity profiles of elite wheelchair rugby players. Journal of Sports Science, 33(19), 2070-2078.

Ribeiro, W. M., & Almeida, M. B. (2020). Performance analysis in wheelchair para-badminton matches. International Journal of Racket Sports Science, 2(1), 22-31.

Rietveld, T., Vegter, R. J. K., van der Slikke, R. M. A., Hoekstra, A. E., van der Woude, L. H. V., & de Groot, S. (2019). Wheelchair mobility performance of elite wheelchair tennis players during four field tests: Inter-trial reliability and construct validity. PLoS One, 14(6), e0217514.

Strapasson, A. M., Baessa, D. J., Borin, J. P., & Duarte, E. (2017). Para-Badminton: principles of the game measurement through the scout. Brazilian Journal of Science and Movement, 25(2), 107-115.

Strapasson, A. M., Chiminazzo, J. G. C., Ribeiro, W. O. M., Almeida, M. B., & Duarte, E. (2018). Para-badminton: technical and temporal characteristics. Caderno de Educação Física e Esporte, 16(2), 1-7.

Tweedy, S. M., Mann, D., & Vanlandewijck, Y. C. (2016). Research needs for the development of evidence-based systems of classification for physical, vision, and intellectual impairments. In Y. C. Vanlandewijck & W. R. Thompson (Eds.), Training and Coaching the Paralympic Athlete (pp. 122-149). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Tweedy, S. M., & Vanlandewijck, Y. C. (2011). International Paralympic Committee position stand-background and scientific rationale for classification in paralympic sport. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 10, 1136-1186.

Ungerer, G. (2018). Classification in para sport for athletes following cervical spine trauma. In B. Hainline & R. A. Stern (Eds.), Handbook of Clinical Neurology (Vol. Sports Neurology, pp. 371-377): Elsevier.

Zemková, E., Muyor, J. M., & Jeleň, M. (2018). Association of Trunk Rotational Velocity with Spine Mobility and Curvatures in Para Table Tennis Players. International Journal of Sports Medicine, 39(14), 1055-1062.

How to Cite
Strapasson, A. M., de Moura Simim, M. A., Cren Chiminazzo, J. G., Leonardi, T. J., & Rodrigues Paes, R. (2021). Are Technical and Timing Components in Para-Badminton Classifications Different?. International Journal of Racket Sports Science, 3(1), 22-27.