International Sports Federations Voting System:  A Case Study of the Badminton World Federation

Richard Vaughan

doi:10.30827/ijrss.33668

Richard Vaughan University of Canberra

DOI: https://doi.org/10.30827/ijrss.33668

Keywords: sports governance, voting system model, differential voting system, International Sports Federation

Abstract

This study examines the governance and voting power structures of International Sports Federations (IFs), with a specific focus on the Badminton World Federation (BWF) as a case study. For National Sports Associations (Members), democratic representation within IFs is fundamental to good governance, with voting systems serving as a key mechanism for equitable participation.
This research critically evaluates the strengths and weaknesses of IF voting systems, proposing actionable reforms to enhance fairness and transparency. Benchmarking against governance models used by FIFA and the International Olympic Committee (IOC), the study explores the broader ap-plicability of differential voting structures. Additionally, the Sport Governance Observer (SGO) Index is employed as an analytical framework to assess governance quality, including transparency, decision-making, financial management, representation, inclusivity, and accountability mechanisms.
The BWF employs a differential voting system for both governance decisions and elections at its Annual General Meeting (AGM), where Members are allocated between one and five votes based on their active participation in badminton. This study examines the historical evolution, operational framework, and implications of this system.
Findings confirm that differential voting remains a viable governance model for IFs but underscore the need for well-defined, transparent, and verifiable criteria. Specifically, the study recommends that voting rights be allocated based on measurable engagement in the sport, such as development initiatives and competitive participation, ensuring a governance system that is both equitable and resistant to manipulation.

References

Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27-40.

Bryman, A. (2012). Social Research Methods (4th ed.). Oxford University Press.

BWF (2024). BWF Constitution. Available at: https://extranet.bwf.sport/docs/document-system/81/1466/1467/BWF%20Constitution%20-%20April%202024.pdf. Accessed January 2025.

Cabello-Manrique, D., & Puga-González, E. (2023). A review of the level of good governance in international sport federations. Journal of Human Sport and Exercise, 18(1), 180–193. https://doi.org/10.14198/jhse.2023.181.15

Chappelet, J. L. (2021). The governance of sport: Managing organization and structure in international sport federations. Routledge.

Corbetta, P. (2003). Social Research: Theory, Methods and Techniques. SAGE Publications Ltd. Dowling, M., Leopkey, B. & Smith, L. (2018). Governance in Sport: A Scoping Review. Journal of Sport Management, 32 (5), 438–451. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsm.2018-0032

Forster, J. (2016). Global sports governance. Oxford Handbook of Sports Management, 78-92. https://doi.org/10.1057/palcomms.2015.48

García, B. (2009). Sports governance after the European White Paper: The politics of the EU sports policy. International Journal of Sport Policy and Politics, 1(3), 267-284.

Geeraert, A. (2018). Sports Governance Observer 2018: An assessment of good governance in five international sports federations. Play The Game.

InsideTheGames (2018). ISF introduces new digital membership system to enhance governance transparency. Available at: https://www.insidethegames.biz/articles/1071885/world-squash-federation-selects-club-locker-as-technology-partner. Accessed January 2025.

Hassan, D., & McCarthy, P. (2014). Sport governance: International case studies. Routledge.

Henry, I. (2013). Athlete representation in IFs: Towards democratic legitimacy? Sport in Society, 16(2), 182-201.

Hoye, R., & Cuskelly, G. (2007). Sport governance. Routledge.

James, T. S., & Garnett, H. A. (2023). The Voter Experience Around the World: A Human Reflexivity Approach. Representation, 60(2), 231–252. https://doi.org/10.1080/00344893.2023.2290714

Kang, Y. (2011): Life is Learning, Daekyo Publishing.

Mills, E. A., Deng, Z., Zhong, Z., & Li, J. (2024). Data-driven prediction of soccer outcomes using enhanced machine and deep learning techniques. Journal of Big Data. Springer.

Parent, M. M., Haye, R., Taks M., Thompson, A., Naraine, M. L., Lachance, E. L. & Séguin, B. (2021). National sport organization governance design archetypes for the 21st century. European Sport Management Quarterly, 23, 1115. https://doi.org/10.1080/16184742.2021.1963801

PlayTheGame. (2022), New research: Alternative voting systems may lead to better governance in sport. Available here: https://www.playthegame.org/news/new-research-alternative-voting-systems-may-lead-to-better-governance-in-sport/ (Accessed January 2025).

Schubert, M., & Könecke, T. (2015). Governance structures of international sport organizations and their influence on election outcomes. International Journal of Sport Policy and Politics, 7(3), 353–375.

Thompson, A., Lachance, E.L., Parent, M. M., & Haye, R. (2023). A systematic review of governance principles in sport. European Sport Management Quarterly, 23, 1863. https://doi.org/10.1080/16184742.2022.2077795

Yin, R. K. (2018). Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods (6th ed.). SAGE.