Validation of wearables for technical analysis of tennis players
Abstract
The aim of the study was to analyze the validity of three well-known commercial sensors (Zepp1, Zepp2 and Qlipp) by comparing the speed data they provide with a speed radar and a 3D photogrammetric system. Thirteen tennis players of different levels were part of the present study: In the first experiment, performed in the tennis field, 4 players executed a total of 77 strokes (serves and groundstrokes), in the groundstrokes using a ball throwing machine to standardize throws at a speed of 70 km/h and with the minimum spin effect allowed by the machine. The ball speed measured with the Zepp1 sensor and with the Qlipp sensor was compared with the speed recorded by a radar (Stalker Pro II, USA) and with a photogrammetric system composed by 4 USB cameras (ELP, China) recording at 100 Hz. The ball and the end of the racket frame were digitized on the video using the freeware Kinovea and their real 3D coordinates were obtained by applying the DLT algorithm, using the Kinemat tool in the mathematical analysis software GNU Octave. The velocity was calculated by deriving the 3D coordinates using a fifth degree spline. In the second experiment, performed inside the laboratory, 9 players executed 20 forehand and backhands each one (n = 360 groundstrokes). Ball speed was computed with the Zepp2 device and with an highly accurate photogrammetric device (Qualisys), considered as the reference. The data of the present work indicate that the hitting kinematics of each player and the speed of the stroke affects the accuracy of the sensor, so further studies are required to evaluate the error in players of different levels and playing styles. The Zepp1 and Zepp2 inertial sensors evaluated in this work seem adequate to measure ball speed in intra-subject studies and the Lin CCC values in the first study and the adjusted values in the second study were almost all greater than 0.75.
References
Delgado-García, G., Vanrenterghem, J., Mildenberger, C., Gallego, L. R., Chicano-Gutiérrez, J. M., & Soto-Hermoso, V. (2020). Accuracy and reliability of a low-cost methodology to assess 3D body posture based on commercial cameras and Excel templates. Measurement, 108638-108638. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2020.108638
Delgado-García, G., Vanrenterghem, J., Ruiz-Malagón, E. J., Molina-García, P., Courel-Ibáñez, J., & Soto-Hermoso, V. M. (2021). IMU gyroscopes are a valid alternative to 3D optical motion capture system for angular kinematics analysis in tennis. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part P: Journal of Sports Engineering and Technology, 235(1), 3-12. https://doi.org/10.1177/1754337120965444
Edelmann-Nusser, A., Raschke, A., Bentz, A., Montenbruck, S., Edelmann-Nusser, J., & Lames, M. (2019). Validation of sensor-based game analysis tools in tennis. International Journal of Computer Science in Sport, 18(2), 49-59. https://doi.org/10.2478/ijcss-2019-0013
Evans, J. D. (1996). Straightforward statistics for the behavioral sciences. Thomson Brooks/Cole Publishing Co.
Jaitner, T., & Gawin, W. (2010). A mobile measure device for the analysis of highly dynamic movement techniques, 2(2), 3005-3010. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2010.04.102
Keaney, E. M., & Reid, M. (2018). Quantifying hitting activity in tennis with racket sensors: new dawn or false dawn?. Sports Biomechanics, 19(6), 831-839. https://doi.org/10.1080/14763141.2018.1535619
Kos, M., Zenko, J., Vlaj, D., & Kramberger, I. (2016). Tennis stroke detection and classification using miniature wearable IMU device. 2016 International Conference on Systems, Signals and Image Processing (IWSSIP), 1-4.
Reinschmidt, C., & Van den Bogert, T. (1997). KineMat. A MATLAB Toolbox for Three-Dimensional Kinematic Analyses. Calgary, Canada: Human Performance Laboratory, The University of Calgary.; 1997 [cited 2020 Jul 22]. https://isbweb.org/software/movanal/kinemat/
Ruiz-Malagón, E. J, Vanrenterghem, J., Ritacco-Real, M., González-Fernández, F. T., Soto-Hermoso, V. M., & Delgado-García G. (2023) Field-based upper-body motor variability as determinant of stroke performance in the main tennis strokes. In Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part P: Journal of Sports Engineering and Technology. https://doi.org/10.1177/17543371231156266
Ruiz-Malagón, E. J., Delgado-García, G., Ritacco-Real, M., & Soto-Hermoso, V. M. (2022). Kinematics differences between one-handed and two-handed tennis backhand using gyroscopes. An exploratory study. International Journal of Racket Sports Science, 4(1), 16-24. https://doi.org/10.30827/Digibug.76982
Shan, C. Z., Sen, S. L., Che Fai, Y., & Su Lee Ming, E. (2015). Investigation of Sensor-based Quantitative Model for Badminton Skill Analysis and Assessment. Journal Teknologi, 72(2). https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v72.3891
Yang, D., Tang, J., Huang Y., Xu, C., Li, J., Hu, L., Shen, G., Liang, C-J., & Liu, H. (2017). TennisMaster: an IMU-based online serve performance evaluation system. In Proceedings of the 8th Augmented Human International Conference (AH '17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, (17), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1145/3041164.3041186
Copyright (c) 2023 International Journal of Racket Sports Science

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.